Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, Vol. 3, No. 1, 41-58 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1541204004270941
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Contrasting Juvenile and Program-Level Impacts on Diversion Service Provision

A Hierarchical Linear Analysis

Michael J. Hogan

Colorado State University

Justin S. Campbell

University of South Florida

This study examined juvenile risk and program characteristics’ relative impact on the number of services provided to juveniles who exited Colorado diversion programs in the 1998-1999 fiscal year. Multivariate hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses indicated program characteristics were generally stronger predictors of service provision than juvenile risk factors. However, some risk factors interacted with program characteristics to significantly predict service provision. Further examination of interaction effects revealed suggestions for successfully implementing modern rehabilitation models as well as for future evaluations of correctional programs. In particular, juvenile community corrections programs should enhance the breadth and depth of data collected for program evaluation and state audit purposes if administrators plan to demonstrate program efficacy.

Key Words: diversion • juvenile corrections • rehabilitation • hierarchical linear modeling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
H. P.B. Lodewijks, T. A.H. Doreleijers, and C. De Ruiter
Savry Risk Assessment in Violent Dutch Adolescents: Relation to Sentencing and Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2008; 35(6): 696 - 709.
[Abstract] [PDF]