| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Juvenile Offenders and the Death PenaltyHow Far Have Standards of Decency Evolved?Mercyhurst College
Indiana University of Pennsylvania In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that because they are less culpable and less able to deliberate about their behaviors, the execution of mentally retarded offenders exceeded the prevailing standards of decency (Atkins v. Virginia). Based on this rationale, and with increasing concerns over wrongful convictions and the execution of innocent defendants, some questioned whether the Courts decision could also apply to juvenile offenders. In March 2005, the majority of the justices determined that executing adolescent offenders violated the Eighth Amendment (Roper v. Simmons). This article reviews (a) recent court decisions on the death penalty, (b) citizen and student opinions on juvenile executions, and (c) comparative policies on juvenile executions. The authors also discuss the politics of the death penalty and the consequences of Roper on juvenile justice policy.
Key Words: juvenile death penalty evolving standards of decency Supreme Court youth juvenile violent offenders
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, Vol. 3, No. 4,
316-333 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
