Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stearman, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of a Shock Incarceration and Aftercare Program for Juvenile Offenders

James B. Wells

Kevin I. Minor

Earl Angel

Kelli D. Stearman

Eastern Kentucky University

Research conducted to date has not shown juvenile shock incarceration (boot camp) programs to favorably affect recidivism. The authors extend the literature by comparing the recidivism of juveniles who completed a shock incarceration program that included a systematic aftercare phase with recidivism among a matched control group of juveniles released from more traditional residential placements. Findings were mixed as regards recidivism at 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-ups. There were no differences in reconvictions at 8-or 12-month follow-ups and no differences in reoffense seriousness across time frames. However, a significantly lower proportion of the boot camp group recidivated during the initial 4-month aftercare phase, and at 12 months, a lower proportion had been recommitted to residential placements. Older juveniles had significantly higher recidivism scores than did younger ones. The findings demonstrate the importance of combining shock incarceration with quality aftercare.

Key Words: shock incarceration • boot camps • aftercare • juvenile offenders • recidivism

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, Vol. 4, No. 3, 219-233 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1541204006290153
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
G. Duwe and D. Kerschner
Removing a Nail From the Boot Camp Coffin: An Outcome Evaluation of Minnesota's Challenge Incarceration Program
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2008; 54(4): 614 - 643.
[Abstract] [PDF]