This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Daigle, L. E. Articles by Wright, J. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Gender Differences in the Predictors of Juvenile Delinquency

Assessing the Generality-Specificity Debate

Georgia Southern University

Francis T. Cullen

University of Cincinnati

John Paul Wright

University of Cincinnati

At the heart of the gender-specificity debate is the argument that gender-neutral theories cannot adequately explain female delinquency. Instead, it has been asserted that theories should incorporate risk factors that capture females' unique experiences. In this context, the current study uses data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health to address the generality-specificity debate. The analysis includes variables not only from traditional criminological theories and the newer life-course approach but also from the feminist perspective. Results from multivariate analyses show that although there are some similarities in the predictors of male and female delinquency, differences also emerged. Variables measuring general strain and involvement are stronger predictors for males, whereas only attachment to school is stronger for females. One feminist theory variable and one life-course variable exhibit stronger effects in the models for females. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are also addressed.

Key Words: gender • delinquency • generality-specificity • feminist • life course

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?